@eyes@ryb some thoughts from 4 years ago: posts.pnut.io/498166. pnut is too small for microblogging, but submitting to the activitypub gods would flip everything upside down methinks.
@eyes@ryb I guess it would be ceding that the most important thing about pnut is the little group of people we still have together, and not pnut as an artifact.
@33MHz Not sure why you say it's too small for microblogging? Do you mean that the userbase is too small to have conversations around your posts? @eyes
@33MHz Have you looked into WebMentions? Seems like it could be a way to have cross-platform conversations but I don't know enough about it to know how well it could work.
@33MHz HTTP went from 1.0 to 1.1 to 2.0 to QUIC/3; HTML has gotten all sorts of upgrades from 1 to 2 to 3 to 4 to 5. Do you think ActivityPub would just get locked in and ossified harder/faster than HTML/HTTP?