Can you imagine a large number of people hosting tiny social webs?
This page says it is possible but not easy. [runyourown.social]
1030245
@prometheus I was talking last night with friends who've had headaches with NextDoor. @fl04t was just talking about bad effects caused simply by too many people connecting together Online.
1030291
@33MHz Talking about this IRL last Friday - trying to work out what the optimal online community size would be. Didn’t reach an answer - (but my reckoning it’s around 150).
//@fl04t @prometheus
1030319
@coopey @fl04t @33MHz 150 is not a random number. There is research [which I need to relocate] on optimal social/tribal/village populations that come to that count. Also compares well to troop sizes of apes...but we use language so social span is more.
1030491
1030505
1030628
@igmp_join Ah thanks. I think that's what I had in the back of my mind, but thought the number higher. I will revise my number down then. Maybe to 120, or 100. Like Path.com. Though it didn't work for them.
//@33MHz @fl04t @prometheus
1030785
@igmp_join @prometheus @coopey @fl04t We could put a limit. Only 150 people can speak on #pnut in a given day. 😉
1030889
@prometheus I think that's why we see a lot of technologists retreat into inaccessible technology, like Gemini protocol, and giving up the public Web, or doing complicated/legally inaccessible pursuits like distributed social networks.
1030292